Kenneth D. Keathley and Mark F. Rooker present a biased set
of questions and answers in 40 Questions
about Creation and Evolution. They are biased because they are both
creationists who take seriously the creation account in Genesis. This book
deals with questions that often arise within the context of a literal
understanding of the opening chapters of Genesis. The questions are grouped in
6 categories: Questions About the Doctrine of Creation; Questions About
Creation and Genesis 1-2; Questions About the Days of Creation; Questions About
the Days of Creation; Questions About
the Age of the Earth; Questions About the Fall and the Flood; and Questions About
Evolution and Intelligent Design.
In 40 Questions about Creation
and Evolution, you will find that many of your questions will go
unanswered. In fact, you may finish the book with more questions than you had
before you began. For example, does the Bible teach a young earth or an old
earth? The authors admit that they are divided on the issue, one being an Old
Earth Creationist, and the other a Young Earth Creationist. In fact, they
identify four major positions that fall under a “creationist” umbrella: young
earth creationism, old earth creationism, evolutionary creationism, and
intelligent design. They candidly state that, “none of the four views… are
without serious problems.”
Keathley and Rooker address topics that have become
shibboleths for conservative and fundamentalist Christians, including the
influence of Whitcomb and Morris and the work of Archbishop Ussher. Young Earth
Creationists, in particular, have been impacted by these works.
The authors are not concerned about converting the reader to
a young or old earth position. They do convincingly demonstrate the problems inherent
with the evolutionary model and show the reasonableness of the doctrine
creation (which they helpfully distinguish between creationism). They devote a
section to questions about the historicity of Adam and Eve and the implications
that this has regarding one’s view of the New Testament.
I appreciate the Christian humility and charity shown by
these authors to those who may disagree with them. For some of us, a particular
position on the age of the earth, the length of the days of creation, and a particular
view of creationism have been tests
of genuine faith. This book lessens the heat of discussion and lets in the
light.